Part of the effectiveness of The Clerk’s Tale is that the Clerk asserts that the tale is not his, that he got it from a scholarly friend during his travels in Italy. Thus, while the Wife relies on her extensive experience, the Clerk gives credence to his tale by asserting that he heard it from a scholar and, therefore, it must be true. By a very indirect means, he lets the pilgrims know that the Wife is wrong, that a woman should be subservient to her husband; furthermore, he thereby supports the teachings of the church, which the Wife had denied.

The two stories have one thing in common: Both are an extreme exaggeration of the respective points of view. The Wife’s insistence that men are to be ruled by their wives might be a point in the Wife’s favor if one were to accept the manner in which Griselda was so cruelly treated by her husband. But then, as the Wife’s tale is a splendid overstatement of her views, so is the Clerk’s tale an overstatement of his refutation of the Wife’s tale.

Even though the Clerk offers a statement in which he asserts that Griselda is perhaps too patient, he objects to the Wife of Bath’s premise that the woman should be the controlling force in any marriage. But of the two, the Clerk is so shy, so demure, so timid, that the Wife’s outrageousness far overshadows his argument, and we remember the Wife with far greater admiration than we do the Clerk.